More Hypocrisy from Feminists – Full Underwear

grandmas-pantiesI was at first surprised and disappointed to learn that the full female underwear is back in style. Even though I am a fan of many things old-school, I can’t imagine how anyone would find full underwear more attractive or sexy on a woman than a thong, unless what it covers is repulsive and actually needs to be hidden.

But then it all made sense to me. There is consistency in feminist hypocrisy –

Most lingerie is designed to appeal to a man,” Ms. Baylis said. “For us, that’s not even a consideration. This is underwear you wear totally for you. Maybe no one will see it, or maybe you’ll put it up on Instagram to share with everyone you know.”

Let me translate this for you: “God forbid we do things that we should naturally be inclined to do – looking more sensual and seductive to the opposite sex while feeling more desirable and sexy as a result. Instead, let’s pretend that lingerie is not for getting attention from men, yet at the same time indulge in attention whoring on Instagram, with no one other than everyone you know.”

Perhaps it’s time to for a new style of underwear for women – boxer with a fly, since they seem to be so eager to become men and grow penis. But then again, as I think about it – if a woman has nice legs, she will look hot in boxers and I could think of a few uses for that fly. Shocking, many guys will probably find boxer on a woman more sexy than full underwear… Oops, sorry, I forgot – lingerie isn’t for men.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s